3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Obesity -

A comparison of national estimates of obesity prevalence from the behavioral risk factor surveillane

ObesityOct 22, 05

Background: Obesity interventions are implemented at state or sub-state level in the United States (US), where only self-reported weight and height data for adults are available from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The prevalence estimates of overweight and obesity generated from self-reported weight and height from BRFSS are known to underestimate the true prevalence. However, whether this underestimation is consistent across different demographic groups has not been fully investigated.

Methods: In this study, we compared the prevalence estimates of obesity (body mass index (BMI) 30 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI 25 kg/m2) in different demographic groups in the US from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and BRFSS during 1999–2000. We also compared the rank orders of the obesity and overweight prevalence across different demographic groups from the two data sources.

Results: Compared to NHANES, BRFSS underestimated the overall prevalence of obesity and overweight by 9.5 and 5.7 percentage points, respectively. The underestimation differed across different demographic groups: the underestimation of obesity and overweight prevalence was higher among women (13.1 and 12.2 percentage points, respectively) than among men (5.8 and -0.6 percentage points, respectively). The variation of underestimation was higher among men. A clear inverse association between educational attainment and obesity prevalence among non-Hispanic African American women was observed from BRFSS data. However, no such association was found from NHANES. While BRFSS can identify correctly the population with the highest obesity and overweight burden, it did not accurately rank the obesity and overweight prevalence across different demographic groups.

Conclusion: Compared to NHANES, BRFSS disproportionately underestimates the prevalence of obesity and overweight across different gender, race, age, and education subgroups.



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  Quitting smoking has favorable metabolic effects
  Early Heart Data Look Good for Obesity Drug
  Glowing fish shed light on metabolism
  Soda & Obesity
  Obesity negatively predicts minimal disease activity achievement in patients with PSA
  Obese teen had to be cut from home in U.K.
  Obesity-Linked Diabetes in Children Resists Treatment
  Beating obesity
  Beating obesity
  Childhood obesity genes identified
  Obese Patients Face Higher Radiation Exposure From CT Scans But New Technology Can Help
  Risk for some cancers rises with U.S. obesity rate

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site