Cellphone risk may be higher in countryside: study
|
|
Mobile phones could pose a higher health risk to rural dwellers, because the phones emit stronger signals in the countryside, Swedish scientists reported Tuesday.
Base stations tend to be further apart in more remote areas so the phones compensate with stronger signals.
“We found that the risk of brain tumour was higher for people living in rural areas than in towns,” said Professor Lennart Hardell, of University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden. “The stronger the signal, the higher the risk,” he told.
The use of cell phones has increased rapidly worldwide. Some researchers have suggested that radiofrequency fields could interfere with biological systems, but there has been no hard evidence that the technology causes health problems ranging from headaches to brain tumours.
Nonetheless, health officials have urged the public to limit mobile phone use or to use hands-free devices.
Hardell and his colleagues, who studied 1429 people with malignant and benign brain tumours and 1470 healthy controls living in the centre of Sweden, said the health risks may not be evident until someone has used a mobile for 10 years or more.
Their research is published in current issue of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
The scientists found that rural dwellers who used a mobile phone for more than 3 years were three times more likely to be diagnosed with a brain tumour than city dwellers. The risk quadrupled after more than 5 years of use.
The researchers questioned both groups about how often they used their mobile phones and for how long. They also looked at whether they lived in the countryside or in towns. Their findings were adjusted for other environmental factors that might increase the risk of brain tumours.
“We still cannot exclude that there might be other undetected risks in the countryside, but we have tried to adjust the results, as far as we know,” Hardell said.
He added the study was quite small and that the findings need to be duplicated.
SOURCE: Occupational and Environmental Medicine, May 17, 2005.
Print Version
Tell-a-Friend comments powered by Disqus
