3-rx.comCustomer Support3-rx.com
Find a product
    HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
 
   
 
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics
Online Pharmacy



Depression is a medical condition that leads to intense feelings of sadness or despair. These feelings don't go away on their own. They are not necessarily related to a particular life event


Join our Mailing List

Men`s Health sites at Top100biz.com




Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Urine Problems -

Delayed surgery for bladder cancer not harmful

Urine ProblemsNov 24, 05

Contrary to several recent reports, delaying Bladder Cancer surgery for several weeks after diagnosis does not worsen a person’s odds of surviving the disease, Swedish investigators report in The Journal of Urology. The author of a related editorial, however, contends that the sooner the surgery is performed, the better.

Recent research suggesting that delays between diagnosis and surgery in patients with Bladder Cancer adversely affects survival is “alarming” because it suggests that slow hospital routines influence patient prognosis, Dr. Fredrik Liedberg and colleagues from Lund University Hospital write.

They studied the issue of treatment delay and prognosis in all 141 patients who underwent bladder removal for advanced Bladder Cancer at their hospital during an 8-year period.

The time from cancer diagnosis to bladder removal was typically about 49 days, according to the team. However, a longer treatment delay - 63 days - was observed for the 71 patients who were initially seen at another hospital before being referred to the researchers’ center.

According to Liedberg and colleagues, “treatment delay did not influence (the risk) of death from Bladder Cancer. Considering all cases, there was no significant correlation between treatment delay and” progression of the cancer.

In an editorial comment, Dr. Michael Cookson of Vanderbilt University in Nashville notes that this study addresses “an important topic which has received increasing attention. Specifically, does delay in treatment compromise survival?”

While the current study suggests that the answer is no, the “preponderance of evidence” to date suggests that a delay of more than 90 days does have a significantly negative impact on outcomes including...survival, Cookson points out.

Moreover, in the current series, most patients were treated “relatively expeditiously”, so the “true impact of delay may not be detectable in this study,” he contends.

Cookson believes there is a “window of curability that can be exceeded. Therefore, once the decision has been made to perform (bladder removal), it should be performed in a timely fashion,” he concludes.

SOURCE: The Journal of Urology, November 2005.



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend

RELATED ARTICLES:
  Men with Health Risk Behaviors Unaware of PSA Test
  Health risk behaviors associated with lower prostate specific antigen awareness
  Male infertility fix works for men over 40
  Even modest weight gain raises kidney disease risk
  Tap water chemicals not linked to penis defect
  Weight Gain Within the Normal Range Increases Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease
  Residual urine not tied to urinary infection
  Weight, lifestyle factors tied to urinary symptoms
  Heart condition in those awaiting a kidney an ominous sign
  Legislation needed to provide coverage for ED treatment after prostatectomy
  Poor kidney function tied to faster heart changes
  Bladder trouble tied to depression, anxiety

 


Advertisement
















Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site