3-rx.comCustomer Support3-rx.com
Find a product
    HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
 
   
 
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics
Online Pharmacy



Presbyopia is an eye condition in which the lens loses the ability to focus over time


Join our Mailing List

Men`s Health sites at Top100biz.com




Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Cancer -

Women, Children Face Higher Cancer Risk from CT Scans

CancerJan 24, 08

The lifetime risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from a computer tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) varies widely, but women and younger patients appear to be at increased risk, according to the July 18 Journal of the American Medical Association.

CTCA, which combines 64 images to produce cross-sectional views of the heart and coronary arteries, has been predicted to be the diagnostic tool of choice for patients with a high risk of developing Coronary Artery Disease. Little data, however, are available on CTCA and its associated cancer risk from radiation exposure.

Researchers led by Andrew J. Einstein, MD, PhD, found that the lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence associated with radiation exposure varied with age, sex, and scan protocol. Lifetime cancer risk estimates for standard cardiac scans ranged from one in 143 for women for a 20-year-old woman to one in 3,261 for an 80-year-old man.

Estimates for electrocardiographically controlled tube current modulation (ECTCM), which uses reduced radiation during part of the cardiac cycle, ranged from one in 219 to one in 5,017, respectively. Estimated cancer risks using ECTCM was one in 715 for a 60-year-old woman and one in 5,017 in a 60-year-old man. A combined scan of the heart and aorta, however, had the highest lifetime attributable risks, up to one in 114 for a 20-year-old woman.

The researchers noted that CTCA should be used with caution with young individuals and women and that different diagnostic tools - stress electocardiography, echocardiography, or magnetic resonance imaging - should be considered.

Emergency Medicine News:Volume 29(11)November 2007p 7



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend

RELATED ARTICLES:
  New statistical model could help reduce breast-lesion biopsies
  Testing for cancer at home
  Tamoxifen easier on the brain than thought: study
  Cancer incidence and mortality drops among American men and women, according to annual report
  Iressa Proves Just as Effective as Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer
  Latinas more likely to regret breast cancer treatment decisions
  Cancer survival rates impact type of Web communities used by patients
  No Protective Effect on Cancer from Long-Term Vitamin E or Vitamin C Supplementation
  Genetics of aging and cancer resistance
  Scientists unravel breast cancer drug resistance
  The Relative Risk of Brain Cancer
  How women can improve their quality of life after breast cancer treatment

 


Advertisement
















Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site