3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List



Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > InfectionsTuberculosis

 

Traveling by car increases global temperatures more than by plane, but only in long term

Public HealthAug 05 10

Driving a car increases global temperatures in the long run more than making the same long-distance journey by air according to a new study. However, in the short run travelling by air has a larger adverse climate impact because airplanes strongly affect short-lived warming processes at high altitudes. The study appears in ACS’ Environmental Science & Technology, a semi-weekly journal.

In the study, Jens Borken-Kleefeld and colleagues compare the impacts on global warming of different means of transport. The researchers use, for the first time, a suite of climate chemistry models to consider the climate effects of all long- and short-lived gases, aerosols and cloud effects, not just carbon dioxide, resulting from transport worldwide.

They concluded that in the long run the global temperature increase from a car trip will be on average higher than from a plane journey of the same distance. However, in the first years after the journey, air travel increases global temperatures four times more than car travel. Passenger trains and buses cause four to five times less impact than automobile travel for every mile a passenger travels. The findings prove robust despite the scientific uncertainties in understanding the earth’s climate system.

- Full Story - »»»    

Certain meat components may increase bladder cancer risk

Cancer • • Bladder cancer • • Food & NutritionAug 02 10

A new study suggests that consuming specific compounds in meat related to processing methods may be associated with an increased risk of developing bladder cancer. Published early online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, the findings may be relevant for understanding the role of dietary exposures in cancer risk.

Eating red and processed meats has been linked to an increased risk of developing several different types of cancer. Animal studies have identified a number of compounds in meat that might account for this association. These include heterocyclic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and N-nitroso compounds. Nitrate and nitrite are added to processed meats and are known precursors to N-nitroso compounds.

Amanda J. Cross, PhD, of the National Cancer Institute in Rockville and colleagues conducted one of the first prospective studies – the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study—to assess the relationship between intake of these meat-related compounds and the risk of developing bladder cancer. They used information gathered through questionnaires to assess the types of meat consumed as well as how meat was prepared and cooked to estimate the intake of these meat-related compounds.

- Full Story - »»»    

Pass child nutrition bill: Michelle Obama

Children's Health • • Food & Nutrition • • Public HealthAug 02 10

First Lady Michelle Obama is calling on the Congress to pass legislation to improve nutritional standards and help fight childhood obesity in American schools.

“We owe it to the children who aren’t reaching their potential because they’re not getting the nutrition they need during the day,” she wrote in the Monday edition of the Washington Post.

“And we owe it to our country - because our prosperity depends on the health and vitality of the next generation.”

- Full Story - »»»    

In Canada, money may matter for cancer survival

CancerAug 02 10

Despite Canada’s universal healthcare system, poorer Canadians with cancer are more likely to die early than their wealthier peers, suggests a new study of almost 100,000 patients from Ontario.

But unlike studies conducted in the United States, most of the difference in survival rates could not be explained by how early doctors caught the cancer.

“It is reassuring that stage of cancer (at diagnosis) does not vary across social groups in Ontario,” Dr. Christopher Booth of the Queen’s University Cancer Research Institute, the study’s lead author, told Reuters Health in an email. But, he continued, “we need to better understand why survival does vary across socioeconomic groups.”

- Full Story - »»»    

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site