3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Public Health -

Blacks more likely to want end-of-life intervention

Public HealthDec 07, 06

Blacks are more likely than whites to want life-sustaining care at the end of life for an incurable illness or a serious physical or mental disability, a new study shows.

While more than half of black individuals surveyed said they would want life support if they had a chronic condition and were brain dead, just 11 percent of whites would want this intervention. Nearly three quarters of blacks said they would want life-sustaining care if they were terminally ill and had senile dementia, compared with 22.2 percent of whites.

These preferences are in conflict with the “prevailing ethic” of the U.S. medical establishment that “it’s not advisable to offer life-extending treatment to people in a terminal situation,” Dr. William A. Bayer of the University of Rochester in New York, the study’s lead author, told Reuters Health.

Bayer was prompted to do the study after noticing how black families frequently wanted a loved one to stay on life support, while hospital staff—largely white - though it should be discontinued.

A number of other studies, he and his colleagues note, have found a preference among blacks for life-sustaining care such as CPR and mechanical ventilation at the end of life.

Bayer’s group asked 50 black and 27 white men and women who were 50 years of age or older if they would want life-sustaining care in eight different scenarios involving different levels of mental and physical status, from their current state of mental functioning to dementia to coma to brain death.

Across the board, blacks were more likely to want life-sustaining care than whites, Bayer and his colleagues found. The differences were starkest in the scenarios involving brain death and senile dementia.

Bayer points out that the current perception among U.S. medical professionals that life-sustaining care should not be given to terminally ill patients is cultural, not absolute, and does also not necessarily offer economic benefits.

“In my practice as a family practitioner I’ve seen that if people don’t feel that the most was done in their eyes for their loved one it can have ramifications for many generations,” he said.

Bayer also urged everyone to appoint a health care proxy and talk with him or her about their preferences for life-sustaining care. “This would avoid a lot of trauma to the family trying to decide what their loved ones wishes would or wouldn’t be.”

SOURCE: Ethnicity & Disease, Autumn 2006.



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  Sex and violence may not really sell products
  GPs and the Fit for Work scheme
  Study shows global warming is unlikely to reduce winter deaths
  Academies make recommendations for improving public health
  As death rates drop, nonfatal diseases and injuries take a bigger toll on health globally
  Designing better medical implants
  Single low-magnitude electric pulse successfully fights inflammation
  Total annual hospital costs could be reduced by rapid candidemia identification
  UTMB develops new online tool for nurses
  Online health information - keep it simple!
  Your privacy online: Health information at serious risk of abuse
  Physician guidelines for Googling patients need revisions

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site