3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Drug News -

Cheaper blood thinner just as effective, study says

Drug NewsAug 24, 06

Injections of the blood thinner heparin treat blood clots just as effectively as a top-selling version that is many times more expensive, researchers said on Tuesday.

To treat deep vein thrombosis, which appears most often as blood clots in the legs, injections of low-molecular weight heparin such as Sanofi-Aventis’ blockbuster Lovenox and Pfizer’s Fragmin have been increasingly seen as more convenient and effective than original heparin.

The original blood thinner, called unfractionated heparin and derived from pig tissues, is given intravenously in the hospital and patients are closely monitored.

The newer, more expensive version of heparin is extracted from the original and has smaller molecules, meaning it is less likely to bind to a protein in the body and presumably making it more predictable and convenient to use. It is injected just once a day, and can be administered by the patient.

But the study by McMaster University researchers found a weight-adjusted dosage of the original, much-cheaper heparin—a six-day course would cost $37 versus $712 for low-molecular-weight heparin—can be injected twice daily without an expensive hospital stay or in-hospital testing.

“That was the underlying reason why we did the study: it is not necessary to do blood testing,” study author Clive Kearon said in a telephone interview.

Blood clots reappeared in less than 4 percent of 700 patients whether they injected the original heparin or low-molecular weight heparin. The rate of major bleeding was also comparable in the two groups.

“This study will open the possibility of an expanded role for inexpensive, ordinary heparin,” Kearon said, noting that most such studies are sponsored by drug companies that may be less motivated to recommend a treatment that costs less.

The study, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, was funded by The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

“If you never do a study funded by a peer-reviewed agency, you’re never going to reduce the cost of therapy,” Kearon said.

The difference in cost of the two blood thinners is not as great in Canada or in Europe, where low-molecular weight heparin is more commonly used.

According to The American Heart Association, deep vein thrombosis occurs in about 2 million Americans a year and an estimated 600,000 of those develop a pulmonary embolism in the



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  New biomarkers may influence drug design and alternative treatments of cancer, study shows
  UGA ecologist finds another cause of antibiotic resistance
  New drug for neuroblastoma shows promise in phase I study
  Baclofen shows promise in patients with alcohol-induced liver disease
  Findings point to an ‘off switch’ for drug resistance in cancer
  Stopping statins may benefit terminally ill patients
  Cholesterol drug users may use pills as a license to overeat
  Pfizer lung cancer drug beats chemo for previously untreated patients
  Mass. General study identifies path to safer drugs for heart disease, cancer
  Gates Foundation awards Notre Dame $23 million for malaria, dengue studies
  Cancer drug protects against diabetes
  Malaria drug target raises hopes for new treatments

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site