3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Heart -

U.S. doctors urged to use heart scans judiciously

HeartFeb 03, 09

Doctors should be judicious in their use of X-ray heart imaging techniques and avoid their routine use to screen for cardiac problems, a leading U.S. medical group said on Monday.

The American Heart Association urged doctors to weigh risks and benefits carefully in ordering diagnostic tests such as computed tomography, or CT, angiograms and nuclear stress tests in order to minimize the doses of ionizing radiation.

Such low-dose radiation has the potential to cause cancer.

A coronary CT angiogram is a heart-imaging test used to see whether fatty or calcium deposits have built up in the arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle. Nuclear stress tests are used to look for lack of blood flow in the heart muscle that could indicate a blockage in a heart artery.

“A patient who is at low risk of having heart disease and who has no symptoms suggestive of heart disease, we really don’t think they should have these scans,” Dr. Thomas Gerber of the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, said in a telephone interview.

Gerber headed the American Heart Association panel that wrote the scientific advisory, which concludes that “cardiac imaging studies that expose patients to ionizing radiation should be ordered only after thoughtful consideration of the potential benefit to the patient.”

Gerber called the tests valuable tools for doctors, and said he did not want to “convey the alarmist message that these scans are inherently dangerous and shouldn’t be done.” Gerber added: “Our mantra is: the right tests in the right patient.”

But medical imaging techniques represent the biggest source of controllable radiation exposure of Americans, and doctors need to be mindful of the potential harm from even relatively small doses of radiation, Gerber said.

“We’re really trying to urge doctors that when they see a patient and have a clinical question, to think whether or not that clinical question can be answered without the use of ionizing radiation,” Gerber said.

The advisory, published in the journal Circulation, also said that once a doctor has established that a cardiac imaging test that uses ionizing radiation is needed, “every effort should be made” to reduce the radiation dose.

There is no federal regulation of radiation dose except for mammograms used to screen for breast cancer, leaving appropriate use of scanning equipment and radiation dose up to doctors and medical facilities, according to the advisory.


By Will Dunham
WASHINGTON (Reuters)



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  New superfoods could help key protein keep bodies healthy
  Mobile app on emergency cardiac care aids best decisions in seconds
  Train your heart to protect your mind
  Mass. General study identifies path to safer drugs for heart disease, cancer
  Tweaking MRI to track creatine may spot heart problems earlier, Penn Medicine study suggests
  Method to estimate LDL-C may provide more accurate risk classification
  Texting heart medication reminders improved patient adherence
  Hybrid heart valve is strong, durable in early tests
  Cardiopoietic ‘Smart’ Stem Cells Show Promise in Heart Failure Patients
  Vitamin D deficiency ups heart disease risk
  Heart surgery safe in Jehovah’s Witnesses
  Magnet helps target transplanted iron-loaded cells to key areas of heart

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site