3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Pregnancy -

Vaginal birth after c-section safe after due date

PregnancyOct 04, 05

Women who have undergone a prior cesarean delivery can safely attempt to give birth vaginally in a subsequent pregnancy, even when they’re at or beyond 40 weeks, US researchers report. However, the chances of being able to complete a vaginal birth are reduced.

The safety of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in a variety of situations has been investigated before, the team explains in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, but little has been published about VBAC attempts for women at or past their expected delivery date.

Dr. Kara M. Coassolo from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues looked at outcomes for 11,587 women attempting VBAC before and after 40 weeks of gestation.

Women at or after their estimated date of delivery were less likely to be successful (69 percent) than were women before their estimated date of delivery (78 percent), the authors report.

Doctors “can counsel women that the chances of VBAC success are decreased in gestations that continue beyond the estimated delivery date compared with those before 40 weeks,” the team concludes. “However, patients can be reassured that the success rate of almost 70 percent is still quite good.”

Rates of operative complications and adverse effects for the mother were also higher for women who attempted VBAC at or beyond 40 weeks of gestation, the report indicates, but the difference disappeared once other risk factors were accounted for.

Still, the researchers note, women attempting VBAC fared somewhat worse overall than those opting for repeat cesarean delivery.

However, “the absolute risk is small,” the team notes. For example, “In women past 40 weeks of gestation, the risk of uterine rupture is 1.1 percent in women attempting VBAC compared with 0.08 percent in those electing repeat cesarean delivery.”

Thus, the researchers write, “The risks of a VBAC attempt are not increased simply because the due date has passed.”

SOURCE: Obstetrics & Gynecology, October 2005.



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  Drug prevents passage of HBV during pregnancy
  BGI study confirms accuracy of its NIFTY in nearly 147,000 pregnancies
  Arkansas to appeal ruling on abortion restriction law
  Immune system ‘overdrive’ in pregnant women puts male child at risk for brain disorders
  Is it safe for pregnant women to eat peanuts?
  Preterm birth of mother increases risk of pregnancy complications
  U.S. teen birth rate lowest since 1946
  Vitamin D supplements found to be safe for healthy pregnant women
  Study finds that folate does not offer protection against preterm delivery
  New tests and interventions may help prevent future health problems
  UNC Miscarriage Expert Available to Comment on Bush’s Miscarriage Disclosure
  Pregnancy outcome affected by immune system genes

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site