3-rx.comCustomer Support
3-rx.com
   
HomeAbout UsFAQContactHelp
News Center
Health Centers
Medical Encyclopedia
Drugs & Medications
Diseases & Conditions
Medical Symptoms
Med. Tests & Exams
Surgery & Procedures
Injuries & Wounds
Diet & Nutrition
Special Topics



\"$alt_text\"');"); } else { echo"\"$alt_text\""; } ?>


Join our Mailing List





Syndicate

You are here : 3-RX.com > Home > Public Health -

Survival up after funds flow into critical care

Public HealthNov 15, 09

Survival rates of patients in intensive care have jumped in England since the government boosted spending and reformed critical care services, a study showed on Friday.

Researchers writing in the British Medical Journal said spending on intensive care services had risen to 1.0 billion pounds in 2005/6 from 700 million in 1999/2000 when adjusted for inflation, producing “major improvements in care”.

Hospital deaths fell more than 13 percent, and 11 percent fewer patients needed to be transferred between intensive care units each year, the study found.

“... Considerable additional expenditure on critical care combined with an explicit centrally-driven programme of modernisation has resulted in dramatic improvements in outcomes,” said the researchers from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre.

Spending on the National Health Service (NHS) and the quality of the care it provides are always a major issue for British voters, who are due to vote in a general election by June 2010.

Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s Labour party is way behind the opposition Conservatives in opinion polls and both sides are keen to reassure voters that health spending will not be cut.

The government’s NHS Plan in 2000 included funding more intensive care beds, adopting clinical guidelines and setting up regional networks of hospitals to improve cooperation.

The study compared data for 1998-2000 with 2000-2006—before and after the changes began—looking at nearly 350,000 patient admissions to 96 critical care units across England.

It found the cost effectiveness of critical care increased after 2000—partly because of better patient outcomes and partly because of smaller increases in the average time patients were in intensive care.

“Collectively these changes represent a highly cost-effective use of NHS resources,” the researchers said.

—-
LONDON (Reuters)



Print Version
Tell-a-Friend
comments powered by Disqus

RELATED ARTICLES:
  Sex and violence may not really sell products
  GPs and the Fit for Work scheme
  Study shows global warming is unlikely to reduce winter deaths
  Academies make recommendations for improving public health
  As death rates drop, nonfatal diseases and injuries take a bigger toll on health globally
  Designing better medical implants
  Single low-magnitude electric pulse successfully fights inflammation
  Total annual hospital costs could be reduced by rapid candidemia identification
  UTMB develops new online tool for nurses
  Online health information - keep it simple!
  Your privacy online: Health information at serious risk of abuse
  Physician guidelines for Googling patients need revisions

 












Home | About Us | FAQ | Contact | Advertising Policy | Privacy Policy | Bookmark Site